Excluding indigenous bioethical concerns when regulating frozen embryo storage: An Aotearoa New Zealand case study.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Elsevier B.V Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101700286 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2405-6618 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 24056618 Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: [Cambridge, UK] : Elsevier B.V., [2015]-
    • Abstract:
      This article undertakes a close reading of the parliamentary debates associated with the topic of embryo cryopreservation in Aotearoa New Zealand. From our critical readings, we argue that there is a lack of transparency over the ethical reasons for enforcing a maximum storage limit. We demonstrate that arguments for the retention of this limit are associated (in New Zealand) with arguments based upon 'build-up avoidance' and 'conflict avoidance' as social goods based on Pākehā [New Zealander of European descent] cultural world views rather than identifiable universal ethical principles. We illustrate that the avoidance of embryo accumulation and related conflict was only achieved by the denial of indigenous spiritual and cultural concerns, while also shifting the ethical burdens of disposition on to clinic staff and those members of the public who protested against enforced cryopreserved embryo disposal. The Pākehā cultural concept of 'tidy housekeeping' emerges as a presumed ethical and social good in the New Zealand situation. This is despite abundant literature documenting the suffering created through forced decision-making upon disposition.
    • References:
      Bioethics. 2011 Jul;25(6):334-41. (PMID: 20047590)
      Fam Syst Health. 2010 Sep;28(3):258-73. (PMID: 20939630)
      Fertil Steril. 2005 Aug;84(2):431-4. (PMID: 16084886)
      Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:934567. (PMID: 23509811)
      Sociology. 1994 Aug;28(3):699-715. (PMID: 11658100)
      Fertil Steril. 2009 Dec;92(6):2094-6. (PMID: 19700150)
      Trends Mol Med. 2015 Feb;21(2):55-7. (PMID: 25662874)
      Sociol Health Illn. 2008 Jul;30(5):772-87. (PMID: 18444955)
      J Med Ethics. 2016 Nov;42(11):738-741. (PMID: 27555449)
      Hum Reprod. 2005 Jun;20(6):1661-9. (PMID: 15760957)
      Dev World Bioeth. 2013 Dec;13(3):119-24. (PMID: 22708805)
      Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(2):499-509. (PMID: 19061998)
      New Genet Soc. 2008 Jun;27(2):113-126. (PMID: 22904673)
      Med Anthropol Q. 2011 Jun;25(2):232-53. (PMID: 21834360)
      N Z Med J. 2015 Nov 20;128(1425):43-53. (PMID: 26905986)
      Annu Rev Anthropol. 1991;20:311-43. (PMID: 12288961)
      Hum Reprod. 2013 May;28(5):1289-96. (PMID: 23508251)
      Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2016 May 12;1(2):104-112. (PMID: 29911191)
      Hum Reprod. 1997 Jan;12(1):3-5; discussions 5-6. (PMID: 9043888)
      Disabil Health J. 2014 Apr;7(2):242-50. (PMID: 24680054)
      Sociol Health Illn. 2011 Mar;33(3):434-47. (PMID: 21226731)
      Fertil Steril. 2011 May;95(6):1980-4, 1984.e1. (PMID: 21411080)
      Hum Fertil (Camb). 2015 Jun;18(2):113-20. (PMID: 25660099)
      Fertil Steril. 2006 Jun;85(6):1623-30. (PMID: 16678178)
      J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Jun;33(2):45-52. (PMID: 22519652)
      Hum Fertil (Camb). 2009 Dec;12(4):185-90. (PMID: 19883291)
      Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2016;26(3):219-247. (PMID: 27818391)
      Hum Reprod. 2011 Mar;26(3):646-54. (PMID: 21216789)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Aotearoa/New Zealand; bioethics; cryopreservation; embryos; indigenous
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20190326 Latest Revision: 20200929
    • Publication Date:
      20201020
    • Accession Number:
      PMC6411506
    • Accession Number:
      10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.001
    • Accession Number:
      30906887
  • Citations
    • ABNT:
      FITZGERALD, R. P. et al. Excluding indigenous bioethical concerns when regulating frozen embryo storage: An Aotearoa New Zealand case study. Reproductive biomedicine & society online, [s. l.], v. 8, p. 10–22, 2019. DOI 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.001. Disponível em: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=mnh&AN=30906887. Acesso em: 29 out. 2020.
    • AMA:
      Fitzgerald RP, Legge M, Rewi P, Robinson EJ. Excluding indigenous bioethical concerns when regulating frozen embryo storage: An Aotearoa New Zealand case study. Reproductive biomedicine & society online. 2019;8:10-22. doi:10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.001
    • APA:
      Fitzgerald, R. P., Legge, M., Rewi, P., & Robinson, E. J. (2019). Excluding indigenous bioethical concerns when regulating frozen embryo storage: An Aotearoa New Zealand case study. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 8, 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.001
    • Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date:
      Fitzgerald, Ruth P, Michael Legge, Poia Rewi, and Ella J Robinson. 2019. “Excluding Indigenous Bioethical Concerns When Regulating Frozen Embryo Storage: An Aotearoa New Zealand Case Study.” Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 8 (February): 10–22. doi:10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.001.
    • Harvard:
      Fitzgerald, R. P. et al. (2019) ‘Excluding indigenous bioethical concerns when regulating frozen embryo storage: An Aotearoa New Zealand case study’, Reproductive biomedicine & society online, 8, pp. 10–22. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.001.
    • Harvard: Australian:
      Fitzgerald, RP, Legge, M, Rewi, P & Robinson, EJ 2019, ‘Excluding indigenous bioethical concerns when regulating frozen embryo storage: An Aotearoa New Zealand case study’, Reproductive biomedicine & society online, vol. 8, pp. 10–22, viewed 29 October 2020, .
    • MLA:
      Fitzgerald, Ruth P., et al. “Excluding Indigenous Bioethical Concerns When Regulating Frozen Embryo Storage: An Aotearoa New Zealand Case Study.” Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, vol. 8, Feb. 2019, pp. 10–22. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.001.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Humanities:
      Fitzgerald, Ruth P, Michael Legge, Poia Rewi, and Ella J Robinson. “Excluding Indigenous Bioethical Concerns When Regulating Frozen Embryo Storage: An Aotearoa New Zealand Case Study.” Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 8 (February 14, 2019): 10–22. doi:10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.001.
    • Vancouver/ICMJE:
      Fitzgerald RP, Legge M, Rewi P, Robinson EJ. Excluding indigenous bioethical concerns when regulating frozen embryo storage: An Aotearoa New Zealand case study. Reproductive biomedicine & society online [Internet]. 2019 Feb 14 [cited 2020 Oct 29];8:10–22. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=mnh&AN=30906887